The author is trying way too hard to position toy cameras within photo history and sometimes sounds a bit silly and tedious. To give you an idea of the tone of the article after stating "...do we really need all these niche luddites continuing to proselytize their anachronistic plastic lenses all over their pretentious micro-galleries while talking about expired stock with knowing smiles and carefully cultured converse sneakers." The author answers this question with a big yes but fails to back it up with any ideas.
For those of you interested in toy cameras it is worth a read.
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment